-
proof by example:
-
The author gives only the case n = 2 and suggests that it contains most
of the ideas of the general proof.
-
proof by intimidation:
-
"Trivial."
-
proof by vigorous handwaving:
-
Works well in a classroom or seminar setting.
-
proof by cumbersome notation:
-
Best done with access to at least four alphabets and special symbols.
-
proof by exhaustion:
-
An issue or two of a journal devoted to your proof is useful.
-
proof by omission:
-
'The reader may easily supply the details'
"The other 253 cases are analogous"
"..."
-
proof by obfuscation:
-
A long plotless sequence of true and/or meaningless syntactically related
statements.
-
proof by wishful citation:
-
The author cites the negation, converse, or generalization of a theorem
from the literature to support his claims.
-
proof by funding:
-
How could three different government agencies be wrong?
-
proof by eminent authority:
-
"I saw Karp in the elevator and he said it was probably NP- complete."
-
proof by personal communication:
-
"Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete [Karp, personal
communication]."
-
proof by reduction to the wrong problem:
-
"To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle stripping is decidable,
we reduce it to the halting problem."
-
proof by reference to inaccessible literature:
-
The author cites a simple corollary of a theorem to be found in a privately
circulated memoir of the Slovenian Philological Society, 1883.
-
proof by importance:
-
A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition in
question.
-
proof by accumulated evidence:
-
Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample.
-
proof by cosmology:
-
The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless. Popular
for proofs of the existence of God.
-
proof by mutual reference:
-
In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in reference
B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in reference C, which is
an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A.
-
proof by metaproof:
-
A method is given to construct the desired proof. The correctness of the
method is proved by any of these techniques.
-
proof by picture:
-
A more convincing form of proof by example. Combines well with proof by
omission.
-
proof by vehement assertion:
-
It is useful to have some kind of authority relation to the audience.
-
proof by ghost reference:
-
Nothing even remotely resembling the cited theorem appears in the reference
given.
-
proof by forward reference:
-
Reference is usually to a forthcoming paper of the author, which is often
not as forthcoming as at first.
-
proof by semantic shift:
-
Some of the standard but inconvenient definitions are changed for the statement
of the result.
-
proof by appeal to intuition:
-
Cloud-shaped drawings frequently help here.
The above material is by Dana Angluin and was published in Sigact
News, Winter-Spring, 1983, Volume 15 #1.
Back to Science/Medicine Humor
Back to Tina's Humor Archives main page